The purpose of this research is to provide a model to evaluate the final effect of politics in Iran's higher education. Before a policy is adopted, due to its wide effects, the results, consequences and effects of such policies should be extensively investigated, so that ultimately this area will be affected by negative results, inefficiency, inconsistency and chaos. not be From the point of view of nature, the present research method is a type of exploratory mixed research with an emphasis on (QUAL) and a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) method was used to investigate the objectives and answer the questions. The statistical population of this research includes two parts. The statistical population in the qualitative section was selected from the policy makers of the higher education system, experts, managers and officials in the field of higher education, and experts in the field of policy making in higher education. The statistical sample of the qualitative part is ۲۰ experts (interviewees) who were approved by the supervisors and advisors and participated in the research until theoretical saturation was reached, and they are managers, executives and prominent experts of higher education in the field of policy making. They should have experience in management and executive work in policy-making positions at the macro and middle level of higher education. The sampling method of this section was purposeful snowball type. The statistical population in the quantitative section includes all experts, managers and policy makers in the field of higher education, which were a total of ۱۵۰ people, which was estimated to be ۱۰۸ people using Cochran's formula. Also, simple random sampling was used in the quantitative part. The information and data required for the research were collected in the qualitative part by two methods, document study and semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative part by using a researcher-made questionnaire. In order to analyze the collected data, in the qualitative part, the foundation data method was used and in the quantitative part, the structural equation method (SEM) was used. The results showed that based on the results of the research, goal setting, research and education as causal conditions through the final effect of policy in higher education on the strategic categories of competitive advantage, formulation and implementation of policy, quality of policy and practice, resource management, communication and coordination. , strategy, tra  arency and accountability and effective models, and taking into account the environmental and interventionist categories, leads to the consequences of speed of action, performance of development and growth, effectiveness and change and transformation.